Source Search Page

favicon bananaip.com

Exacting Standards for Pharma Trademarks and their Dominant Parts

6+ day ago — 

...Sun Pharma’s ISTAMET XR CP was a Schedule G drug, which came as a... ...Sun Pharma’s “ISTAMET XR CP” was registered in 2014 by its predecessor... ...In the case of American Cynamid Corpn.... ...Although the Supreme Court in Cadila Healthcare refused to interfere...

favicon bananaip.com

SEP, Infringment and principles relating to actual costs – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 5

1+ week ago — 

...become an increasingly common trend in IP litigation before the Delhi High... ...Discussing about costs, the Court referred to the common law, CPC... ...The Supreme Court in Uflex Limited v.... ...of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 within four...

favicon bananaip.com

Call for Feedback: CGPDTM Service Excellence Survey 2024

1+ week ago — 

...have any questions, or if you wish to speak with an IP expert/attorney... ...No.40, 3rd Main RoadJC Industrial Estate, Kanakapura Road, Bangalore...

favicon bananaip.com

Exploring Patent Hold Up, Royalty Stacking, and Hold Out – Ericsson v. Lava – Part 3

1+ week ago — 

...) Licensing were discussed in the Ericsson Vs.... ...Several aspects of Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND... ...As per the Court, Ericsson was offering a lower royalty rate over... ...Therefore, the Court stated that Ericsson was not committing acts...

favicon bananaip.com

Google’s Patent appeal dismissed, fine of 1 Lakh imposed

2+ week ago — 

...In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court not only dismissed an appeal... ...filed by Google LLC (the Appellant) against the order passed by... ...the EPO in Murata Manufacturing Company Limited T0970-00-3.4.2 decision... ...Further, the Court relied on the case of Avery Dennison Corporation...

favicon bananaip.com

Citing gross delay and strong likelihood of confusion, court refuses CEAT’s appeal

2+ week ago — 

...The Delhi High Court in a recent case dismissed an appeal by CEAT... ...The Appellant, CEAT Limited filed an appeal against a refusal order... ...No.40, 3rd Main RoadJC Industrial Estate, Kanakapura Road, Bangalore... ...Citation: Ceat Limited vs The Registrar Of Trade Marks [C.A....

favicon bananaip.com

Section 3(k) principles – Ericsson vs. Lava – Part 2

2+ week ago — 

...the Ericsson vs.... ...While Part 1 of the Ericsson vs.... ...Citing portions from the press release issued by the Press Information... ...as Microsoft Technology1, Ferrid Allani2, and Open TV3, and a general...

favicon bananaip.com

Website/Social Media and Accessibility Job Opening at BananaIP

3+ week ago — 

...and updates to the BananaIP website, including portals and social media... ...This full-time position is based in our Bangalore office, with the... .... - Skilled in HTML, PHP, CSS, Bootstrap, JavaScript, and jQuery....

favicon bananaip.com

Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Royalty Rates (Ericsson vs. Lava) – Part 1

3+ week ago — 

...lawsuit concerning Standard Essential Patents (SEPs).... ...In a comprehensive and extensive judgment, the Delhi High Court has... ...Setting Organisations (SSOs), which have facilitated the seamless... ...Regarding the validity of the patents in question, the Court found...

favicon bananaip.com

Delhi High Court reverses Patent refusal, Highlights significance of procedural adherence in handling claims of PCT National phase applications....

4+ week ago — 

..., in Mitsui Chemicals Inc. vs Controller of Patents, overturned the... ...The Delhi High Court, in a recent decision dated February 23, 2024... ...The Assistant Controller of Patents (the Respondent) refused the... ...The Court also directed the Patent Office to issue a fresh hearing...



**Content is provided on an “as is” basis. 4Internet, LLC makes no commitments regarding the content. What you see here may not be accurate and should not be relied upon. The content does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of 4Internet, LLC. You use this service and everything you see here at your own risk.