H.Res. 294 Agreed to in the House Congress

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications"; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.

  1. Introduced
  2. Committee
  3. Agreed to in House
Sponsor Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5] Introduced April 7, 2025 Cosponsors 0 Latest action April 8, 2025

Summary

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of this resolution yet.

Congress.gov

Roll-call votes

Actions

  1. Apr 8, 2025 Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  2. Apr 8, 2025 On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473)
  3. Apr 8, 2025 Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 92). (text: CR H1473: 2)
  4. Apr 8, 2025 On ordering the previous question Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 213 - 211 (Roll no. 91).
  5. Apr 8, 2025 Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1480-1481)
  6. Apr 8, 2025 POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 294, the Chair put the question on ordering the previous question and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. McGovern demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  7. Apr 8, 2025 DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 294.
  8. Apr 8, 2025 Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1473-1480)
  9. Apr 7, 2025 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 15.
  10. Apr 7, 2025 The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 22, H.R. 1526, S.J. Res. 18, and S.J. Res. 28 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one hour of debate on each measure and one motion to recommit on H.R. 22 and H.R. 1526, and one motion to commit on S.J. Res. 18 and S.J. Res. 28.
  11. Apr 7, 2025 The House Committee on Rules reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-50, by Ms. Foxx.

Congressional and federal records come from official public sources: the House Clerk, the U.S. Senate, GovInfo and the Library of Congress (bill status), the Federal Register, and the congress-legislators project. They are copied on a schedule and may lag the official record by a few hours; the official sources govern. News and coverage counts are drawn from the 4Search index and reflect what the press published, not 4Search's views. Nothing here is an endorsement of any candidate, party or position. Terms of use.